| Report on the Youth Convention by Stein Ramstad (Swedish delegation) Last week, in a unique and innovative exercise of democracy, 210 young citizens met in Brussels to make their voices heard and to contribute towards the building of Europe. We came from a vast range of backgrounds: from Ireland in the west to Turkey in the east; from Spanish communists to far-right xenophobic Danes, from pupil and student organisations, trade unions and scouts, from organisations of the disabled to those of ethnic minorities, to name a few.
We were faced with a difficult task: under an extreme time-constraint, to overcome our differences and produce a strong statement, an answer to the question, "what do young people want for the Europe of tomorrow?". It had to be strong and concrete enough to make an impression on the senior Convention and the general public, and rich enough to reflect the diversity and breadth of the Youth Convention. Obviously we would disagree on many points. Some wanted the Tobin tax and a fight against global capitalism, others wanted to ban abortion and pre-marital sex. Some wanted Europe to be a security and defence superpower, others wanted a European welfare state. Despite these differences we were united by one thing: *A demand for democracy.* Regardless of political colour, regardless of whether you usually fight for the environment or for rights of the disabled, we all saw that our work could only bear fruit if there are democratic institutions, where we can support the politicians we like and work to throw out those who disappoint us.
A democratic Europe, a federal Europe, was therefore a basic structure we could agree on, and the citizens can later work to put in it what they choose, be it a welfare state model, be it a beacon for free trade in the world, or for global environmentalism.
A minute (very small) minority among the delegates had the, in my view, outdated position that democracy can only exist within the borders of the nation state, and that the democratic process is reserved for ethnically homogenous groups within the "vaterland" (sic). These forces fortunately constituted a small part of the Youth Convention (approx 10%) and could not, even with the concerted support of MEP Bonde's party machinery, disrupt the proceedings or control the final result.
Instead, the Youth Convention produced a strong result, demanding a European Federal Constitution. We want a European Government, accountable to the Parliament, consisting of a Chamber of the Citizens (EP) and a Chamber of the States (Council). Their powers and their relation to each other and to the national level must be clearly defined in the Constitution on the basis of subsidiarity, transparency and accountability.
We would not have reached a strong and coherent result without the sacrifice and tremendous work done by the chair, Giacomo Filibeck, the Presidium, and the three rapporteurs. They were thrown into the process at a late stage, put under extreme time pressure, and carried out their tasks with extreme professionalism and objectivity. We must also acknowledge the work done by the European Youth Forum in preparing and organising the event, ensuring that the Youth Convention took place under as good conditions as possible.
We can be proud of our result, but the fight for the Europe we want is far from over. I am confident that our elected officers, in co-operation with the European Youth Forum, will continue the work to make sure that our voice is heard and remembered.
Until we meet again to remind the senior Convention of our demands, thank you!
Source:
Stein Ramstad,
delegate to the Youth Convention, Swedish Delegation
JEF Federal Committee member
Stein@jef-s.org
Information uploaded by Maarten Linden on February 05, 2003 11:23 AM
|